I have syllabi for my fall classes! Well, all but one; that prof hasn't posted it yet. (They're posted on the law school equivalent of Blackboard; Westlaw does its own course-management thing. So I don't have to wrestle with Blackboard. Given that back when I took grad school classes, professors didn't all use e-mail yet, some profs still typed syllabi, I don't think I'd yet seen course materials distributed as PDFs, and online course management systems didn't exist, it's a little weird negotiating one as the student rather than the prof. It's not any prettier than Blackboard, I can say that much.)
This also means I have the reading assignments for my first day of class. Ack!
Two of my profs have an interesting (to me) policy called "present and prepared": when you get to class, they circulate a seating chart and if you're present and prepared, you circle your name and they know they can call on you. One prof docks you if you're not present and prepared for x number of classes, the other rewards you if you're present and prepared for more than x number of classes. If you say you're prepared and the professor figures out you're not, you get docked; and if you get someone to sign you in as prepared and present and you're not there at all, you're in BIG trouble. (Though I suppose some days the luck of the draw would let you get away with these bluffs, if the professor didn't get around to calling on you.)
I thought this was fairly cool because it means that if you're not prepared, the prof knows not to call on you and waste everyone's time (and embarrass you in front of everyone).
It also seems to encourage you to come to class even when you're not prepared so you can learn something - because you don't have that fear of being called on when unprepared to keep you away. This was something I struggled with when teaching - students who thought, "well, I didn't do the reading so I won't go to class." Yes, I much prefer students to DO the reading, but even if they haven't, I still want them to show up! Not because I want to call on them and make them look stupid, but because they might learn something regardless.
I wonder how well such a policy would transfer to a different academic setting? It seems better suited to larger courses than wee tiny ones (my law school classes run from 35-40 to 80-90, I think). It also seems more designed for a course in which the professor is running the discussion/interactions, rather than students generating them (it's about answering the professor's questions, not so much about other participation). Anyway, I thought it was interesting.
It was also heartening to think that class participation counts for something. It's a teeny-tiny something, but it can add or subtract a couple of points from your final grade (and I'll take all the points I can get). I mean, I know the crucial thing remains the exam - that's what determines your grade, really - but since I know that I learn better if I go to class and talk about the subject, it's nice that these profs seem to consider that a valuable activity as well.
It has also dawned on me that this means very soon, I'll be sitting in class taking notes. I plan to use my laptop for note-taking (I always liked writing my notes by hand in the past, but I also want to be able to cut/paste/reorganize/revise/otherwise manipulate my notes when studying for exams, which is much easier to do with computer files than handwritten sheets, and if I take them on the computer to start with, I don't have to waste time entering them into the computer later), and this leads me to my bleg:
I've been looking at two programs that are basically note-takers/outliners (outlining is very big in law school): Circus Ponies' Notebook, and the Omni Group's OmniOutliner Pro. Both are effective, easy outliners. Both cost about the same (I'd be upgrading to OOP, not buying the full version). Both have things going for them: OmniOutliner Pro feels more "professional", more like a multi-functional power-app. Its interface is extremely clean - almost to a fault; it's a little spartan for me, who likes her Mac because it's pretty. OOP feels a bit more flexible than Notebook, but conversely the learning curve for using that flexibility seems a little steep. Notebook flirts with cutesiness - you take notes on "notebook pages" of ruled yellow or white paper, or you can use graph paper - but I actually quite like the notebook metaphor. I like that Notebook allows you to keep "writing pages" (plain text) as well as outline pages in the same document. And Notebook seems maybe a bit more limited in what it allows you to do, but it's easier to learn what it does allow. Notebook indexes your notes for you, which is a feature that appeals to me; I'm not sure if OmniOutliner Pro does that or not. (I'm sure you can search OOP for keywords, but what I like about the index feature is that you don't have to know already what term you used in a given context - you can just skim the list to see what they are.)
So the bleg part: anyone out there have an opinion on why one of these applications is better than the other? (FWIW, I've played around with MS Word's outlining feature, and first, it's really ugly, and second, it doesn't have the features that I like about Notebook/OOP, so I know I'm not going to use that.) Thanks so much!