I've been struggling somewhat with the purpose and function of this blog for a while now. I recently came across a description of it as "self-absorbed," and while part of me wants to be outraged (what! how dare you imply my every thought isn't a precious jewel offered up for the greater good of humanity!!), I also have to admit that, yeah - this blog is pretty self-absorbed.
Because, you know, it's a blog. About me. And my life.
It got me thinking, though, and I do think this blog was less self-absorbed when I wrote from the position of a professor (although it's also possible that my self-absorption was just more interesting to my usual audience, since I was talking about the kinds of things they all encountered in their own academic lives as well). I would not be at all surprised--or offended--if some of you who started reading this blog when I was a professor find it less interesting now that I'm a student again, since I think most of my original audience were either academics or people interested in academia for whatever reason.
I'll be honest, I think this blog was better when I was a professor, because by the time I'd started, I'd been in academia for thirteen years (counting all my time as a grad student). I wasn't an authority by any standard, but I had enough experience to offer commentary on the profession--commentary that wasn't all about me, myself, and my own experiences--and in which I could respond to some of the themes and issues that profession was facing.
It is very hard to maintain the kind of analytic distance that allows you to offer that kind of commentary when you become immersed in an entirely new endeavor, one that also places you in a the explicitly subject position of student. (I've talked about this before.) First, I don't feel like know enough about the law as a profession to offer any kind of informed commentary. Second, everything is new! and overwhelming! and coming at me a million miles a minute! (not quite as bewildering as last year, but still lots of new stuff, and just lots of stuff to deal with, period.) It's hard to maintain analytic distance when you're frantically treading water till the next wave comes your way--to totally shift metaphors, it's hard to separate the wheat from the chaff when you're buried under the harvest (I am abandoning this metaphor now). This blog becomes a way just to process what's going on, even though it's nothing remotely different from what every other law student experiences, nor is what I have to say about it remotely original.
It's funny, because I read some of my old posts--often posts I've forgotten I even wrote--and think they were actually pretty good. This blog never was a work of academic scholarship, but it was about academia as much as it was about me. Now, I think it's more about me than it is about the law, or even legal academia.
And I suspect many of you will say, "So what?? It's your blog! You write about what you want to write about!" Which, if you do, I completely appreciate. It's just been an interesting shift - I have met, through blogging, a whole community of wonderful people who are now my friends regardless of what we do for a living. But it changes this blog for me to talk to "friends" instead of to "fellow academics," and I miss the kinds of conversations that used to take place here, rather than just providing updates on my life.
Which is not to say that I have any magical plan for how to change what I'm doing. And you know, maybe it really isn't all about me, and my blog has changed because blogging has changed. (I'm thinking especially of what Laura wrote here, which I wanted to respond to at the time, but never got around to.) But these thoughts have been tumbling around my head for quite a while, so I thought I would finally let them out, and see what they look like in the light of day.
Even though this entire post simply proves the whole self-absorbed thing.