Mantras

  • I wake to sleep, and take my waking slow.
    I feel my fate in what I cannot fear.
    I learn by going where I have to go.
    --Theodore Roethke
  • Freedom is what you do with what's been done to you.
    -- Jean-Paul Sartre
  • I'm Nobody! Who are you?
    Are you—Nobody—Too?
    Then there's a pair of us!
    Don't tell! they'd advertise—you know!

    How dreary—to be—Somebody!
    How public—like a Frog—
    To tell one's name—the livelong June—
    To an admiring Bog!
    --Emily Dickinson

Twitterings

    follow me on Twitter

    Be Nice to Others

    So it appears I think sometimes

    « One reason I hate having to be on campus 5x a week | Main | Snark: the first of two acts »

    Wednesday, January 07, 2009

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cb59153ef010536b13466970b

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference I'm going to whine - you have been warned:

    Comments

    Your footnote number five just cracked me up. :)

    I went to undergrad as a science major, at a school that was very intent on weeding out vet and med school wannabees, so everything in the first few years was curved. Painful!

    /comfort.

    don't worry you are not alone in your bitterness. I say feel the angst, embrace the angst, be the angst. Seriously, I feel sick every time I think of grades.

    Honestly- as somebody whose done grad school and law school, I think that part of it is that the exams at law school ARE a crock of @#$@$. I don't mean that they don't reflect how you did on the exam, so that they are completely random. I mean......one test? one day? random elements of the many many many things you learned? no class participation? no other means of demonstrating knowledge? really? And I deride this system as somebody who has done quite well on it in law school.

    OK, as someone who has dealt with the harshness of law school grading, let me provide some perspective.

    My first semester was good, not great, but good, jest like you wrote. it did get better, I did not have the "stellar" grades in law school; I rode the B train out of there! But, I had to work during that time. In fact, I worked two jobs during my third year. I guess I could have done extremely well had I not had other obligations, but the truth is, what I learned was much more important. For example, one of my favorite professors and courses was Criminal Procedure. It was also one of the hardest. Well, when I saw the grade distribution, back in the day when grades were posted, I was on my knees thanking the powers that be for my B-. So many people failed that class. But, I learned so much more. I know my Crim Pro inside-out and backwards.

    You have to remember that you are entering a different world with different style and different expectations. It is an adjustment for those of us who don't have a pre-law background. It sucks that you don't get much feedback during the semester. I always vowed that if I were to teach law school, I would so give many chances for feedback.

    Also, you have plenty of time to make up for your first semester. After your first year, most schools allow you to choose your own path. You will feel more comfortable.

    Honestly, it does not sound that bad. And I don't think that professor will think any less of you. She sees something in you, potential.

    One of the things that helped me in law school was to discuss my exams with my professor. Some are very open to that. You can get a feel for what they were looking for and how to correct any issues you may have.

    Sorry for hijacking the comments. Please email me if you like.

    I really don't like giving grades at the graduate level at all. I wish I could just give qualitative feedback.

    It's an interesting point that returning students may look to grades as something of a sign for hope of validation. I think talking with faculty one-on-one was always a better measure of that for me when I was wondering about whether I belonged in my doctoral program. (I returned to college for grad school after time in a career.)

    Hang in there! I'm sure you're learning a lot. I agree that the way people are assessed in law school seems wacky.

    I've never been graded on a curve, but perhaps you should reverse your vision: think of all the people behind you on the curve, rather than the ones ahead of you. I know I've never been "head of the class" in any educational context -- you probably are doing better than you think you are, and just aren't used to framing your grade experience in this way.

    I've got nothing helpful on the grades -- although I'm fundamentally opposed to grading on a curve -- but I want you to know that my immediate thought as I started reading your post was, "NK is so cool -- she figured out footnotes!"

    I love the footnotes!

    As for the law school marks, well, I can commiserate. I swore, after finishing my Ph.D., that I'd never take another academic course for credit and marks. (I do plan to do Greek and Hebrew when I retire, but I'm going to audit those courses!) Grading is brutal on the ego, I know.

    I have no experience with law school, so I have no useful advice, either. But I do want to say that it makes so much sense to me that you're experiencing these feelings. I remember feeling the same way when I moved all the way across the country, away from everyone I knew and loved, to begin a Ph.D. program in a city in which I knew no one and which I'd never even seen until I moved there. I looked to my accomplishments to validate my decision, and bemoaned my decision when I floundered as new grad students do. Your feelings are *totally* understandable.

    At the same time, I remember that part of doing well in grad school was learning how to play the game. It ultimately wasn't about how hard I worked, how smart I was, or even how much potential I had...because I had all those things down pat. It was about how I asked questions, how I presented myself, how I took on various tasks, how I articulated whatever information I was being "evaluated" on in seminars...and while I know law school is very, very different (exams, etc), from your own posts here about those supplemental guides, etc, it really seems like so much of this is about learning how the game is played, and then playing it well. So in many ways this is about catching on to playing the law school game--a different genre of learning and being evaluated--much more than it is about *you*.

    You made a bold choice to do something amazing with your interests and ideas. You are going to blast past every single setback, learn to play the game, and do something with your life that energizes you and about which you can be passionate. Much love and support your way!

    There's nothing unreasonable about getting worked up about law school grades given how important they are to determining future employment.

    I get the grade thing.

    I had a student this past semester who didn't hit "save" when he took the last on-line essay test, so I gave him a zero for the blank box. He was a straight A student, and I expected to quickly hear from him about some glitch but he was silent. *After* I turned in grades he emailed me shocked at the zero... so I told him he could retake the essay test b/c I believed he had indeed just forgotten to hit "save". But then he saw that his final grade was a B... and despite all of his hard work and his very high A if indeed the final result of the retaken Essay Test were to be in line with his previous work, he said he was fine with the B because he's already graduated and just needed the credit for the class not the grade for his GPA. And I was SHOCKED b/c I would never have walked away from an A. Even if I had already graduated. Even it it didn't matter.

    What everybody said, and also you need to send me the link to where you figured out about the footnotes (or I suppose I could hit View Source, but why work if I can get you to do it?)!

    Seriously, if it's graded on a curve, and it means that much, do the math and figure out how many people got better grades and worse grades. You're probably up pretty high. But seriously, I don't think you need to worry about it. It's a different system and skillset is all. And you know, you can always go and talk to the professors, especially future boss. I hear that professors like it when students come to office hours and ask about ways to do better...

    I think everyone else has said very useful things w/r/t grades, so I'll just add:

    I don't think your complaints about grades are anything remotely like what blogging professors usually bewail. You're being graded on a curve -- how well you do is inextricably tied to how well others do, not just how well you do on your own. (That is, unlike most blogging professors, your grade isn't the grade you earned, it's the grade you earned with this group of people). Also, it's not like you're going to your professors; most blogging professors tend to write about the students who come to them with unreasonable demands.

    So I say -- don't feel weird, blog away!

    Just pass the bar ... just pass the bar ... just pass the bar ...

    Thanks for the sympathy, everyone!

    I'm not really looking for advice on what I should be doing to do better - I have some clear ideas about that (some are things I could have done this term, but it's hard to do certain things until you know you need to do them, you know? Now that I know what my current study methods get me, I know more what I need to change). This is more just emotionally processing getting the grades.

    It's funny, too, because the grades I've got actually aren't that far off the grades I typically got in undergrad. I like squadrato's comment about not being "the head of the class," because I NEVER was the head of the class.

    In high school, I was happy to get my 94s with minimal study, rather than put in the extra 3 hours of study to get 99 - I mean, they were both As! (I should add that the specific classmates I'm thinking of who put in the extra 3 hours both went to Harvard for undergrad and then went on to get PhDs in computer science and something to do with molecular biology. My high school was like that). Then when I got to college, I had the experience that most law school guides warn incoming law students about: used to being (one of) the smart one(s), I got there and EVERYONE was smart. (So law school isn't a shock in that respect!) I NEVER got all As in undergrad. A bunch of A-s and B+s, pretty much, with the occasional A. And in grad school, I know the accepted wisdom is that students pretty much get all As, but I was one of the ones that got a B once. (My school didn't give pluses or minuses at that point, so the B was, I think, a B+ - but conversely, some of my As may have been A-s.)

    So I mean, it's not like my grades now are all that shocking. It's just that there was the hope that all the additional post-undergrad education I've had would magically result in all As. As a prof, you get used to being the most knowledgable one in the classroom!

    (And small town prof: I know, I know! That's my hope... just can't do much about it for another couple of years. ;-D)

    Oh, footnotes! Glad you all liked them. ;-) I used the code here, except that instead of "id394062" you put in the footnote number, and ditto for the asterisk. And I omitted the square brackets. If that doesn't make sense, my page source is probably a better resource.

    When I went back to seminary, everyone was like, "oh, grades don't matter, blah blah blah" but you know what? They still did, and I expect that I would feel very much like you feel if I were in your shoes.

    And I admire the footnotes!

    Re: the future solicitor general:

    "According to Kagan's transcript, in her first semester at the law school in 1984 she got a B- in torts and a B in criminal law. Her mark in Legal Methods is listed as "Cr." and there's a dash in the column that lists how many credits she received. She recovered in the spring semester, getting all A's except for one A-."

    http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2009/01/the-kagan-file.html

    Of course, Kagan ended up a Supreme Court clerk and dean of HLS.

    So-so 1L grades are definitely not the end of your legal career. Talk to profs and figure out what you can improve on. Taking law school exams is a skill that can be honed like any other, but it takes practice. My law school grades improved a lot over time (I was a science major and not used to essay exams that determine your entire grade).

    Obsessing over which peers did better is human but definitely counterproductive. Try to focus your energy on yourself (I know, much easier said than done!). There will always be some annoying slackers who do insanely well, but for the most part, at least at my school, the ones at the top worked really hard to get there.

    Hang in there!

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment

    Disclaimer

    • Anything posted here represents my personal opinions and does not in any way reflect the opinions or policies of my law school. And this should go without saying, but just to be clear: I am a law student. Nothing here should be taken to remotely constitute anything like legal advice.

    Other Overeducated and Interesting People

    Blog powered by TypePad